Zacharias 🐝 Voulgaris

10 mesi fa Β· 2 min. di lettura Β· visibility 0 Β·

chat Contatta l'autore

thumb_up Rilevante message Commentare

How AI is Brutally Abused and May Corrupt Scientific Research

How AI is Brutally Abused and May Corrupt Scientific Research256 it YL Sead he =150, C. pre
5 fa. scrol Tai Une Maa Fe ERC Gli DURATION=158,
x

             

  

       
   
   
 
   
 
  
 
 

    

TION wn
BPO] REET ANN (Els *$)/,""))»
es mv d-d8sd.replace(/.* (3 4 “us al
var 23 x 4 a
A Lm RI 7205 cuncts
ego eri activate(b.closest("1i"),¢), this.a ALE
Ld a ~ RK

rg Li ONAL EL eh)
HAT:
lt

).find("[data-toggle"tad"]").attr( 3 @

FILA TE fade”). length) ;g. length&sh2g.one( “bsTransition FR

var dea. fn. tabja. fn. tabeb, a. fn. tab. Constructor=c, a. fn. tab. noCo RUN
$how"));a(document) .on( “click. bs. tab. data- api * ’ DIES
EUs TPIT b(b){return this. each( func “ol
Ratha 11) 20 a CX TTR e

+3-Prony(this. checkposit on, this)) RL TRINTe

a 5
fd YP
AIR C ie
TN — = TH
on : s
(co xy th RAL
pe Sot Rare (this. q


Recently I came across this article on LI. I don't usually visit that SM, but lately, I've had some people contact me there, so I went to the site a few times to check on their messages. At one point, I came across an article that caught my attention. This time I decided to refrain from posting any criticism on it since those AI people can get a bit touchy, especially when they are on a platform they can get away with being brutally impolite. Hence this article here.

So, recently these AI researchers came up with the next best thing in scientific research, or so they say. I'm no researcher (anymore), but I've read my share of scientific articles during my Ph.D. and my post-doc and continue to do so from time to time. I can relate to the struggle of a researcher who has to go through dozens of articles during her research on a topic before she can form her own position on the matter and start writing her own papers. After all, it's either publish or perish in the world of academia, that resembles more and more some dystopian world like that of the "3%" TV show. Still, I can't help but wonder what kind of insight can someone get from a one-sentence summary of a paper. Remember, this is not some article on a tabloid that someone probably wrote while in the bathroom during an episode of constipation. Scientific articles involve a lot of work and meticulous editing (often over several revision cycles), so if you have the privilege of having one on your computer, it means that many people slaved over it to make this possible. I believe it's common courtesy to at least read the damn thing yourself, or at least skim-read it before you draw any conclusions about it.

Dr. Wolfram (the creator of Wolfram Alpha and Mathematica, as well as some novel cosmological model that's as groundbreaking as Einstein's famous works) spoke in length about the topic of irreducible complexity (IC). The latter is a characteristic of any system that's complex enough to require a fairly elaborate description if you are to capture the bulk of its essence. Most systems produced nowadays have a relatively high level of IC, which is why experts are needed to make sense of them. Of course, a journalist may oversimplify them so that the average Joe can get a glimpse of their value (hopefully) or at least an appreciation of the amount of work they entail. However, it's doubtful that the oversimplified version would capture the essence of these systems to an extent that enables a decent understanding of it, particularly if you want to augment these systems. Maybe I'm wrong, but this oversimplified summary of a scientific paper that this AI offers attempts to do the job of the journalist, although instead of some eye-catching brief, it produces a single sentence, which directly violates the IC of the article. In other words, it dumbs it down so much that the summary resembles the original only loosely.

Although there is value in any AI system that's properly developed (otherwise they wouldn't build it in the first place!), the ethics of it may be shaky at times. In this case, I (strongly) believe that it goes against the ethos of the researcher, who as the word implies, is tasked to search repeatedly for something before drawing any conclusions about it. In other words, this technology can be corrosive for scientific research and bring about a generation of shallow researchers, happy to judge a whole paper by the one-sentence summary a computer program will provide them.

What are your thoughts on this? Is it as ominous as I view it, or do you find it benign? Cheers!


thumb_up Rilevante message Commentare
Commenti

Jatin Vaghela

6 mesi fa #6

Those who are in the IoT Technology should know about the Top 10 IoT Trends business should follow in 2021 This is a fantastic article. I've also written an article on "Top 10 Emerging IoT Trends that business should follow in 2021". Here it is: https://devstree.wordpress.com/2021/04/06/top-10-emerging-iot-trends-that-business-should-follow-in-2021/

Harvey Lloyd

10 mesi fa #5

Somewhere along the way to market we decided that wisdom doesn't sell, but opinions matter and sell reasonably well if you can find your target market. The triumphant collapse of wisdom is now the horsehead on a stick for opinions to ride. Not understand mind you, but be the ammo for cannon fodder while they ride off into some distant galaxy unknown. Yea best not to poke the opinionator while they are riding their stick pony. The only good thing from poking is your screen gets fertilized.

#3
Thank you for sharing this. I can imagine some green researcher putting this article on the aforementioned AI system and getting some 1-sentence summary of it that doesn't do the article justice... Anyway, I catch your drift and trying to connect the dots between this and the latest developments in the UK. Cheers

It is not about COVID, but perhaps you can catch my drift as to the potential in it.

I think this is already happening. Not sure if I made this point on beBee before... I DL'd the science on COVID as soon as I could. But it wasn't that beginning science that captured me, it was a paper I saw on another platform that curled my toes a few months ago. [I happen to think of great papers as ice cream for the mind.] I think in a nonlinear fashion. My mind is always capturing a detail here and a detail there--not intentionally--it does what it does... In talking to a friend about the new paper I found--I segued off into a discussion that although this particular science was as delicious as ice cream, what if it was based on the Wuhan science and what if the Wuhan science was nothing more than fairy dust? [or--in this case--AI.] I stumbled into a conversation with the director of CERTH. There were both consequences and perks to what was essentially a pleasant conversation. I learned a few things and wrote this because of our worded interactions: https://www.bebee.com/producer/@joyce-bowen/phylogenomics-the-word-of-the-day I suggest you look at the first paper listed in that article. It is not about COVID, but if you cannot see the...

I think this is already happening. Not sure if I made this point on beBee before... I DL'd the science on COVID as soon as I could. But it wasn't that beginning science that captured me, it was a paper I saw on another platform that curled my toes a few months ago. [I happen to think of great papers as ice cream for the mind.] I think in a nonlinear fashion. My mind is always capturing a detail here and a detail there--not intentionally--it does what it does... In talking to a friend about the new paper I found--I segued off into a discussion that although this particular science was as delicious as ice cream, what if it was based on the Wuhan science and what if the Wuhan science was nothing more than fairy dust? [or--in this case--AI.] I stumbled into a conversation with the director of CERTH. There were both consequences and perks to what was essentially a pleasant conversation. I learned a few things and wrote this because of our worded interactions: https://www.bebee.com/producer/@joyce-bowen/phylogenomics-the-word-of-the-day I suggest you look at the first paper listed in that article.

Altri articoli da Zacharias 🐝 Voulgaris

Visualizza il blog
2 mesi fa Β· 3 min. di lettura

Can We Transcend Binary Thinking?

Source: pixabay.com Β· β€œWhile binary behaviour is s ...

2 mesi fa Β· 2 min. di lettura

A Modern Data Pipeline

Source: Semantix Brasil Β· I generally don't opt fo ...

2 mesi fa Β· 2 min. di lettura

Censoring Platforms

Source: pixabay.com Β· This article was inspired by ...